Canned Energy

Canned Energy

What’s the difference between “natural” and your standard energy drink?

By Caitlin Schille

Energy drinks are everywhere. There are entire sections of grocery stores and gas stations devoted to the brightly colored, attractively named pick-me-ups. Some are not much more than chemicals and artificial flavors while other claim to be “natural” alternatives. Which do you turn to for that quick shot in the arm when you have 4 hours left in the workday and you feel like you’re not going to make it? Better yet, should you resort to energy drinks, natural or otherwise, at all?

Common energy drinks, despite their popularity, have received much negative press due to harmful ingredients and their link to serious health consequences. To make matters worse, your typical energy drink, which claims to treat the causes of low-energy, simply masks the problem, and then exacerbates it.

These health consequences are more serious than heightened nervousness or shakiness. According to livescience.com, health outcomes linked with energy drink consumption include heart problems, the risk or miscarriage in pregnant women, increased likelihood of alcohol dependency, increased likelihood of drug abuse, and impaired cognitive function.

Because common energy drinks such as Red Bull and Monster have been linked with negative health outcomes, many have turned to so-called “natural” energy drinks. So, how do “natural” energy drinks compare to standard energy drinks?

Standard energy drinks contain of a host of ingredients capable of causing adverse consequences.

First of all, they contain a half-cup of sugar, excessive amounts of caffeine, red food dye, and taurine. Because of this, consumers have been driven to select energy drinks with a “natural” label. This has worked well for companies marketing these “natural” products, as products labeled as natural or organic grew 13 percent, while overall food sales grew only 3.4 percent.

Unlike standard energy drinks, “natural” energy drinks rely heavily on the B vitamin complex, which play a significant role in energy metabolism.

While the addition of the B vitamin complex is a marked improvement to standard energy drinks, “natural” energy drinks still fall short of being an ideal healthy choice. Like standard energy drinks, “natural” energy drinks still contain very high levels of caffeine and taurine. Furthermore, some consumers are fooled by the label of “natural”, mistakenly believing that this label is indicative of a healthy choice. However, a product needs only needs to contain 5 percent of a natural ingredient to achieve such a label.

[infobox title=”How to Improve Your Energy Levels”]

As both average energy drinks and “natural” energy drinks are not ideal choices to promote personal health, here are some suggestions for improving energy levels:

  • Consume enough protein. On average, one should consume 1 gram of protein for every per pound of lean body mass.
  • Get sufficient sleep. A typical night’s sleep should last 7-8 hours. To increase quality of sleep, create consistent patterns surrounding the night’s sleep.
  • Drink more water. The recommend amount is 8 8-ounce glasses per day. Even slight dehydration slows metabolism, so it is critical to energy, health, and fitness to stay well hydrated.

[/infobox]

The bottom line is that “natural” energy drinks are an improvement upon the common, standard energy drinks. Unfortunately, still fall woefully short of what constitutes a healthy method of increasing energy levels.

Healthy Magazine

Healthy Mag is staffed by a team of journalists, researchers and health experts who have a goal of presenting you with useful information that you actually want to read.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

Making More of Midlife

Tue Mar 1 , 2016
Why middle age is not the beginning of the end.  Written by Taylor Smith Mid-life crisis is a phrase that tends to get bandied about rather too loosely these days, in my humble estimation, but it’s a phrase that’s evolving. The prevailing opinion forty years ago was that the mid […]
Making More of Midlife